It should be eliminated in other areas, too. Recently, the US Supreme Court has moved to end affirmative action in higher education. It’s not really a surprise, then, that young white men have apparently become less willing to defend at risk of their lives a society which discriminates against them and blames them for all the evils of history – evils which they themselves had nothing to do with. A US example is the recent case of accounting firm PWC, which has belatedly been forced to allow white people apply for its internship scheme. This was deemed to be too many, despite the fact that slightly more than 80 per cent of British people are white. All groups have been prioritised except one, to the point where it is often a serious disadvantage to be a white male, particularly when it comes to getting a promotion or a job – as in the case of the RAF in recent times.Īnother British example was the recent case of the TV station Channel 4, in which protests were made over the appointment of five new directors, four of whom were white. For a long time now, the disciples of affirmative action and critical race theory have been at work. The government needs to improve the offer, and create working conditions more in-line with expectations of the society of today, whilst balancing the need to retain combat lethality. Pay needs to rise at least in average with other public sector bodies, if not far higher given the skill sets required and the risks to life which we routinely ask our men and women in uniform to run on our behalf.
MoD contracts for poor service providers need to be cut and offered to better managed contractors. Military housing and accommodation needs urgently improving. I hate to break it to anybody reading this, but forcing equality of outcome on something as important as the nation’s defence is not the solution to our recruiting crisis. His successor, Sir Richard Knighton, has since apologised over the affair. The head of the RAF at the time, Sir Mike Wigston, conveniently managed to avoid any real public scrutiny, though his reputation rightly lies in ruins after trying to defend the shambolic and disgraceful policy. There is a strong case to be made that this breached employment law, and was thus illegal. Best illustrating this woke agenda is the Royal Air Force’s shameful recruitment fiasco from 2022 – when it was discovered that female and ethnic minority candidates were prioritised over white male recruits, regardless of suitability. This is merely the latest apparent policy to attempt to force equality of outcome in the British military. In another ill-thought out and controversial move to attempt to fix the UK military’s recruiting crisis, last week Defence Secretary Grant Shapps declared that ‘women are the solution to the Armed Forces recruitment crisis’. Peddling politically motivated and deeply flawed ideologically driven quotas is quite another. Recruiting targets are consistently not met, but the main priority is not to get more people to join up – it is to get more non-white people and women to join up.įailure to meet recruiting targets is one thing.
The UK Armed Forces are in a similar depressing situation. The US military is 17 per cent women, so the recruiting crisis is primarily one among white men.Ĭlearly, something inside the US Army’s recruitment system is failing, both in terms of targets being drastically missed, and a failure to recruit effectively among the nation’s largest ethnic group. According to the US Census from 2022, around 59 per cent of all US citizens were from white backgrounds. Underpinning this drop was a dramatic decrease in white recruits from 44,042 in 2018, to just 25,070 in 2023, leading to the proportion of white recruits falling from 56.4 per cent of all recruits in 2018, to just 44 per cent. It was reported in this newspaper recently how the US Army has seen a dramatic fall in the number of white recruits, as the website found that the army fell 10,000 short of its 65,000 enlistment target. There is absolutely nothing worse for the combat effectiveness of a military, than attempting to use recruiting as a social engineering program.
Let me begin by making this point as clearly as possible.